Election Subsidy, Bigger LGU Budgets… “Pwede Na Yan”

The 2nd ANC Leadership Forum was not without its share of motherhood statements thanks to Senator Loren Legarda, MMDA Chairman Bayani Fernando, Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay and Former President Joseph Estrada. Thankfully, the participants, with the exception of Estrada, managed to slip in a few ideas worth exploring. These are:

1. government subsidy for election campaigns (Fernando)

2. empowering local government units with increased budgets (Binay)

3. eliminating the “pwede na yan” (that will do) mentality (Legarda)

I am in favor of Fernando’s idea of passing the burden of financing election campaigns to the government. One obvious benefit is that it would level the playing field and give virtual unknowns equal opportunity to make themselves known to the electorate. Voters would then have more choices other than the usual faces.

I’m just not sure if having this set-up could really help put a stop to corruption as some people including Fernando believe. Maybe it could if elected officials only steal to pay back their election sponsors or to recoup their own expenses. Unfortunately, that is not the only reason why graft and corruption occurs. If it were then let’s not allow our politicians to spend another centavo from their own pockets.

Related to this, I think it’s about time  media entities especially the big TV and radio networks consider providing real public service by offering free airtime to all candidates. Anyone care to be the first? Kapuso? Kapamilya? As an incentive, I promise to be a loyal viewer of whoever will be the first to heed this call. Religious stations don’t count.

Moving on…

Binay’s idea of empowering local government units or LGUs by increasing their budgets also caught my attention even though it is nothing new. It’s an idea that has been floated around by other politicians in the past.

In an ideal world, giving local government units bigger budgets and free hand to manage it should be enough to ensure the delivery of better government services. The only problem is — our world is far from ideal. Binay himself has said during the ANC Forum that favoritism still comes into play in the granting of budgets. He noted that if the LGU official is not in the good graces of the powers that be he or she would have a hard time securing the funds he needs to effectively govern his area of jurisdiction.

There is one other issue that should be identified with regards to the disbursement of budgets. It’s about checks and balances. This is an issue that needs addressing even under the present set-up. Without proper accounting and auditing the risk of misappropriation becomes greater. Someone should closely monitor the use of any and all government funds. In fact, those doing the monitoring should be monitored as well. And, if we really want to look at it in the extreme, the monitors of the monitors should also be monitored. It’s that or we come up with a measure that would force corrupt officials to control their thievery.

Finally, let’s look at Senator Legarda’s idea that we do away with the “pwede na yan” (that will do) mentality. If I didn’t have anything to add to the idea I would have simply brushed it aside as just another motherhood statement.

In any case, Legarda correctly identified this albeit indirectly as a flaw in the Filipino character. Many, if not all of us, have been guilty of having such a mentality. It’s sad. As a nation, we should once and for all rid ourselves of this kind of mentality if not we condemn ourselves to an eternity of mediocrity. Unfortunately, purging ourselves of this mindset is  easier said than done especially where older generations are concerned. It is the younger generations who still have a chance of not developing such a mindset. That is, if we, the older generations, will try to create for them an environment that punishes mediocrity and rewards excellence. We should have done this yesterday.

Come May 2010, this “pwede na” mentality will again rear its ugly head. Many of us will vote for panderers, liars, thieves, and their ilk. Some will do so because they  don’t know any better. Others because they genuinely believe their choice. Sadly, most will do so because they are convinced the lesser evil is “pwede na.”

Share

About bp

5 Responses to “Election Subsidy, Bigger LGU Budgets… “Pwede Na Yan””

Read below or add a comment...

  1. paul says:

    Bayani is not the only one who came up with the idea of a publicly funded campaign for Presidents.

    Gordon was another, though he failed to mention this himself during the first ANC Forum.

    Having mentioned his name once, let me get to other ideas.

    – The funding should not go to the candidates directly but to the party that nominated him.

    – Make party switching illegal.

    – Revise the OEC (omnibus election code) to allow political campaigns prior to the election period. This is very much like the idea of legalizing drugs or prostitution so that government can regulate it.

    [Reply]

  2. Ian says:

    I like how Bayani has said that we should ‘strengthen political parties’ although I’m kinda in the dark as to how that would work. Care to explain the mechanics of it a little bit? The idea is appealing to me although it seems a little vague. I think it has something to do with how the US founded its two strong parties – the republicans and the democrats.

    [Reply]

    lpgd Reply:

    to ian…

    here’s something from bf’s blog:

    A two-party system whose campaigns are funded by public money will moderate poll spending and minimize vote buying and other forms of electoral fraud.

    A campaign based on issues and on distinct political and economic philosophies will offer voters a genuine choice on election day.

    A responsible campaign financing law will penalize and prohibit unconscionable campaign contributions and influence buying by big political patrons. This practice corrupts the electoral process by making politicians beholden to vested interests.

    Furthermore, no reform is complete if we allow politicians to make a mockery of the electoral system. Election protests pending before the Electoral Tribunals sleep the sleep of the dead. Cases are decided years after the elections are over. The wheels of justice grind exceedingly slow. The will of the people is frustrated. If blessed in 2010, I will look into how we can abbreviate the electoral protests so that the will of the people can prevail. Only then can we serve justice and observe the true meaning of democracy.

    what’s unappealing to me aboout our parties is that they don’t really have an ideology. what they have in abundance are interests. i read somewhere that in our country there is only one true political party and it’s the communist party of the philippines.

    [Reply]

  3. LA says:

    Since her first term as a legislator, Loren co-authored various laws and established programs in support of her advocacies under the acronym L.O.R.E.N.
    Law, Order & Good Governance
    Rights of Women and Children
    Education
    Environment
    Employment & Entrepreneurship
    Nationalism
    Loren Legarda

    [Reply]

  4. For the information of everybody, Please visit Marikina City & verify for yourselves how their System of Govt. works:
    1.Tax collection performance
    2. Peace & Order
    3.Education Dept.
    4.Fire Dept.
    5.Health Dept.
    6. Jail Dept.
    7.Public Works Magugulat kayo on Micro level how BF transformed Marikina.Same w/ Gordon in Subic.

    [Reply]

Leave A Comment...

Blog Widget by LinkWithin