Possible Solutions To Traffic

I haven’t been updating this blog for some time now. I thought I’d be rid of writer’s block by now but it seems it might take me a while before I can get back to my old routine.

Fortunately, a reader by the name of dvopilgrim left a comment that I thought deserves its own space not only because of its length but because it contains a number ideas worth thinking about. He left this comment on an old post of mine titled “The Root Cause of Metro Manila’s Traffic Problem.”

Jeepney: Blessing or Curse?

The jeepney had been a symbol of Filipino culture and ingenuity. Modified from surplus American jeeps to accommodate many passengers, it had been around since the end of World War II as the staple of public transportation all over the country, especially in big cities.

I admit that my frustration with Manila traffic contributed much to my thoughts in this post. But I believe that the jeepney today, instead of being the blessing that it had been in the past 60 years, has become an archaic relic of the past, an invention that had its day, and should be encased in a museum of Philippine history.

Its predominance in the highways and byways has turned from a blessing to a curse. Because of the lack of discipline, and knowledge of and obedience to traffic rules, regulations and signs, it is the main cause of the horrible Metro Manila traffic. It is the primary culprit of the noxious smog that envelops most urban areas. (How do these chimneys pass the anti-smog inspection?) Most of them have little or no insurance, and coupled with lack of discipline and knowledge, they cause many costly accidents.

The secondary problems that jeepneys cause are many: long commute hours, low-productivity, respiratory health problems, waste of gas, and corruption among traffic police and enforcers, in addition to hearing problems because of the blaring radios!

Possible Solutions

It is difficult to pinpoint one or two causes of the huge traffic problems in metro areas because there are many. But in addition to the lack of discipline among all drivers and out-of-control motorcycle and tricycle drivers, I can see two other major contributors.

The first is the number of commuters all day long because, for one thing, even the simplest transactions cannot be done by phone or online, but only in person. What can be done about this? Not much, really, until corruption and dishonesty are kept in check. Online shopping, banking and document processing are probably years, if not decades away from reality, but doable.

The second is the so-called boundary or surcharge system among bus and jeepney operators. How does this contribute to traffic congestion? Simply, in the mad scramble for passengers because their earnings depend on the number of passengers they can get in a day’s driving, drivers stop and park anywhere, even in the middle of the roads, tying up traffic.

As an engineer, I always get into a solutions mode when I see problems and think of ways to improve on how things are done—I also had experience as an industrial process engineer. It would be extremely difficult—some would say even impossible—but nothing less than a comprehensive mass transportation overhaul would suffice, beginning with government ownership. First, jeepneys should be phased out from all major roads and highways and replaced with urban mass transit such as buses and trains. Second, employees of this government-owned transport system should be salaried, which means they get paid fixed monthly salaries that are even better than what they earn today with their hard work. Third, these buses and trains should be operated according to a fixed schedule, being dispatched with frequency based on the time of day. Fourth, all buses from outside Metro Manila should be allowed only at the fringes of the metro area. Fifth, designated bus stops should be strictly enforced.

What happens to all the jeepney drivers and barkers? They would be absorbed and retrained into the mass transport system as drivers, conductors, inspectors, dispatchers, mechanics, janitors, etc. Drivers should be retrained and reprogrammed so that discipline and obedience is hardwired into their brains. The traffic enforcers, in addition, should also be paid regular fixed salaries.

One other thing that seemed to work for the MRT and LRT trains is the seating configuration. The buses could also be configured in the same way, with seats only on the sides for women, elderly and the handicapped, so that the aisles are wide maximizing the density of passengers per square meter of road. There could even be segregation of women, elderly and the handicapped from the rest of the bus, as in the trains. There should be wide doors in the front, middle and back, so the time to load and unload is minimized.

I’m sure that there are many more improvements that mass transport experts can think of to untie the big traffic mess and lessen the misery of commuters.

The above may sound like a pipe dream, but would be a small start and would only work, obviously, if corruption is minimized. The transportation czar should run the system like a business for profit, but with rules and regulations strictly enforced throughout the system.

Now the big question is where to find that honest, incorruptible transportation czar.

If I may add, more than an honest and incorruptible official, what we need is someone who has the political will to implement the necessary changes to the system.

Thanks dvopilgrim for this.

Share

About bp

11 Responses to “Possible Solutions To Traffic”

Read below or add a comment...

  1. jay says:

    In other countries like the UK, they have congestion charges/taxes in metro streets. The charge is so high only the few drive their cars through, it also brings in income for the government. I dont think this will work in the Philippines cause jeepney drivers and the rest of the public will call this undemocratic if it was implemented.
    I also blog on the news and world events.

    [Reply]

    bp Reply:

    jay,

    i won’t mind not using my car if we had a truly efficient mass transport system.

    [Reply]

  2. Roadethic says:

    I agree that jeepneys should be replaced. And yes I’m pretty sure so many drivers and transport groups will call this undemocratic but someone needs to take a stand. If there is a solution and an alternative why hesitate to use it. specially now that the railways are being rehabilitated, new LRT extension is being constructed, buses in Edsa are lessen. I think we’re in a optimistic path..:)

    http://roadethic.blogspot.com/

    [Reply]

  3. Deo says:

    CAUSE OF TRAFFIC:
    1. Jeepney! – mga walang pinag aralan na drivers, bastos walang modo! Dapat silang tanggalin sa kalye ASAP! Matuto tayong mag lakad, may sidewalk para maglakad, huwag tayong senyorito na pag labas ng bahay gusto may papara at sasakay na agad!

    2. Lack of Major roads – Our major roads can be counted in fingers, this is why i wanna support Villar instead of Noynoy, Villar though was corrupt still managed to make roads to ease congestion like C5 against SLEX. What about Noynoy? SCTEX? oh cmon dadaan ka pa talaga sa loob ng luisita para makalabas ng mc arthur highway. parang nag field trip ka Central Azucarera de Tarlac

    3. SLow moving vehicles – cmon! you must not be running at 40kph on a highway please naman maawa ka sa mga nasa likod! tatalo nalang ang linya natin babagal bagal ka pa!?

    4. Too many unwanted vehicles – BUS! we got tons of BUS! Bus that are not full of passengers! Buslanes !? Useless bus lanes, the bus can occupy private vehicle lanes and MMDA cares a damn about it

    5. MORE MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS! – from QC to Paranaque is hard to commute, sana our government would make an MRT lane going to Las Pinas and Paranaque. We need more mass transit system! BRING BACK THE TRAMS!

    6. MANILA OVER CROWDED – Manila too evercorwded! We got alot of lands outside manila, why develop it instead!

    [Reply]

  4. Mac says:

    I understand your concerns about the traffic situation but let us not get fixated on jeepneys i’m not sure but i learned that 65% of the vehicles passing by EDSA are privately owned vehicles.

    [Reply]

    Chua Reply:

    public utility vehicles still account for the 45% though, and private cars seldom make stops in between trips unlike jeepneys and buses.

    [Reply]

  5. Ramon says:

    There are no jeepneys plying the EDSA yet there are also horrific traffic logjams along that route. So it is not the jeepneys per se but the person behind the wheel and the overseers of the entire traffic system who need to be educated. Any tool, machinery or system in the hands of unskilled or unschooled users and operators will never work effectively.

    [Reply]

    bp Reply:

    when we talk of jeepneys, buses or whatever puv we’re of course referring not only to the vehicle/machinery but the operator/driver as well.

    and yes there are no jeepneys on edsa so clearly it’s not just jeepneys that is contributing to the problem. it’s all PUVs. that’s not to say though that everything should be blamed on PUVs, but without a doubt a disciplined PUV sector would be a good start.

    have you ever tried avoiding getting stuck in the middle of an intersection. i have so many times and all the time i find that there’s no use trying to be all disciplined not when the puvs around you are not inclined to do the same.

    in all those times i ended up being overtaken by a jeepney, bus or taxi. discipline is alien to them. they’re always racing against each other reason why every chance they get they will overtake. it doesn’t matter if the traffic light is red.

    [Reply]

  6. Tim says:

    Hi there! this is so true. I sent your link to the mmda email. I hope they read this though.

    [Reply]

    bp Reply:

    thanks for that. hopefully the current mmda admin is more receptive to suggestions.

    [Reply]

  7. bonita says:

    i will walk so that no more traffic

    [Reply]

Leave A Comment...

Blog Widget by LinkWithin