Hiram muna ako ng linya sa kolumnistang si Conrado de Quiros.
Tatagalugin ko na lang nang makuha n’yo.
Bastos si Senator Noynoy Aquino. Oo, bastos siya with a capital B as in bwiset. Saan ka naman nakakita ng kumakandidato para sa pagka-pangulo pero ayaw humarap sa mga debate o forum. Ang dami pang palusot kesyo ganito o ganyan.
Magisip isip naman sana tayo. Harap harapan nang bastusan to. Hindi niyo ba nahahalata? Imbis na pagsikapan niyang kumbinsihin tayo na kaya niya talagang pamunuan ang bansa natin sa pamamagitan ng pagpapakita sa atin ng kanyang mga plano para sa bansa heto’t dadaanin na lang niya sa papuluridad o kasikatan. (Hindi pa niya sariling kasikatan ang gagamitin. Ang kapal ng mukha.)
Bastos talaga. Akala ata ni Senador Noynoy Aquino bobo ang lahat ng Pilipino. Palibhasa kitang kita kasi niya na marami pa ring Pilipino ang bulag na sumasamba kina dating Senador Ninoy Aquino at dating Pangulong Corazon Aquino kaya hayun dun na lang siya tututok. Ika nga ng maraming iba na nabibwisit na rin sa kanyang estilo, “Mama at Papa na lang. Bakit pa nga ba magpapakahirap sa mga plataporma plataporma na iyan.”
Mama at Papa. Garapal talaga. O heto sa mga uto utong galunggong, magpakasawa kayo kay Mama at Papa.
Sa totoo lang ayoko na sana magsulat ng tungkol kay Noynoy kaso nababastusan talaga ako sa estilo nito. Hindi ko rin maintindihan kung bakit hindi rin magawa ng mga taga-suporta niya na impluwensyahan naman ang kanilang idolo na ayus ayusin naman ang pangangampanya. Mas gusto pa ng mga uto utong ito na ipagbunyi pa lang ang lantarang kabastusan ni Noynoy.
Now this is strange. A new survey by Pulse Asia shows that of all the presidential candidates Senator Manny Villar enjoys the trust of more Filipinos. It shows Senator Noynoy Aquino only at second place. Here’s an excerpt from an abs-cbnnews.com report.
The January 22-26 survey showed that 70% of Filipinos had much trust for Villar, compared to 64% for Aquino. Eighteen percent of voters said they were undecided about Villar while 23% said the same for Aquino. Both candidates had the same percentage of voters (12%) saying that they had little trust for the two candidates.
Aquino and Villar were statistically tied in the last presidential survey conducted by Pulse Asia last January 22 -26. Thirty-seven percent of Filipino voters said they would vote for Aquino in the presidential election while 35% said they chose Villar.
I do not hide the fact that I’m not a fan of election surveys. I strongly believe they are manipulated in one way or the other. However, I’m making an exception with this survey because I like how it takes away from the Aquino camp’s apparent claim that their candidate is the only trustworthy candidate. I wonder how the yellow horde will react to this.
By the way, if I were a believer of SWS and Pulse Asia surveys I’d probably say this is a development for the simple reason that it shows that not all Filipinos are buying Noynoy’s honesty schtick.
But then again, I am an anti-election survey kind of guy so I’ll stick to my stand that this or any other election survey out there are not to be believed. More importantly, they should not in any way serve as a basis for how we should vote.
In the first place, how can anyone really tell that this or that candidate is trustworthy? Do Noynoyistas and Villaristas have intimate knowledge of the real character of their favored candidates? Are they possessed with extra-sensory powers they are able to see into the hearts and minds of these politicians both of whom refuse to articulate exactly how they will fulfill their respective campaign promises of ridding the government of corruption and putting an end to poverty.
The truth is the respondents of this Pulse Asia survey (if indeed they do exist) just followed their gutfeel. Nanghula lang sila. In all likelihood they will do the same come May 10. Good luck with that.
We can now hear more people talking about platforms. Unfortunately, it’s quite obvious most people still can’t differentiate between a real platform and the usual motherhood statement. When a candidate says he plans to fight corruption or implement reforms on education many would simply accept it as a platform statement. The fact is our candidates are merely mouthing off platitudes.
What’s really troubling is that a number of supposedly enlightened personalities are also guilty of the same stupidity. Perhaps, they’re just taking the position that such pandering statements already constitute a platform because saying otherwise would only expose their candidates’ vacuity. One of them even insists that the so-called “social contract” of Senator Noynoy Aquino is a platform.
Contrary to what these pseudo-enlightened people are saying, a platform is supposed to be made up of specific plans. Analyzing the type of political discussions we currently have, it’s easy to conclude that there is hardly any specificity. Our candidates are basically saying the same general statements, a fact highlighted at a recent forum organized by the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
(excerpt from a gmanews.tv report; bold highlight mine)
Liberal Party standard bearer Sen. Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III on Tuesday cried foul over a perceived bias against him by the moderator of a forum hosted by the Philippine Chamber of Commerce Industry (PCCI). “Napaghahalataan yata masyado, manong Tony (It’s becoming too obvious, brother Tony),” Aquino told moderator Tony Lopez after he was bypassed in the sequence of questioning. Aquino was referring to what he felt was Lopez’s preference for his closest rival Sen. Manuel Villar Jr. of the Nacionalista Party. Lopez, for his part, apologized and quipped: “Ah sorry, kasi bawat tanong pare-pareho lang kayo ng sagot (Oh, I’m sorry, that’s because for each question you all give the same answer).”
This lack of specificity does not help the voter make out exactly who among the candidates has the better solution to a particular problem. The following sentence from an article featured in The Economist should give us an idea why this is not a good thing.
On campaign platforms, policy is nearly absent, though the country’s problems are clear.
While it is good more people are now aware that the word “platform” exists, it would be better if they actually know what it refers to.
Just saw a TV news report on how much was spent by political candidates in the last election. Seeing the figures, most of which were close to the 100 million peso mark, made my head spin. I couldn’t help but think how such a big waste elections are especially here in the Philippines.
A lot more people could have benefited had those candidates simply pooled their funds together and launched some kind of socio-civic project. They could have built classrooms, low-cost housing etc. It would have been better if they used the money to finance the education of hundreds or maybe even thousands of children. With hundreds of millions of pesos, I’m sure those politicians could have easily figured out some way to really do what they always promise to do but always forget to fulfill, that is to help poor people.
But of course, that’s all too idealistic. By default, a politician’s money always goes first to whatever endeavor there is that would potentially benefit him first and foremost. To the typical Pinoy politician, helping out others is only worthwhile if there’s a clear return of investment.
As I was watching that news report, I couldn’t help but sense some irony especially when the newscaster said something that sounded to me like a subtle criticism of political campaign spending. It just struck me as strange that this TV station would even come out with such a report when in fact it stands to gain big-time from all this. It’s a bit hypocritical, isn’t it?
Of course, there are other reasons why Pinoy-style political campaigns cost so much. One of these is the showbiz mindset. Since most Filipino voters are still stuck at being star-struck, the Pinoy politician naturally treats his campaign as if it was one big showbiz production.
So what do we get? Substance? You wish. Song and dance numbers? Yes, lots of it. Feet washing? Now, that’s new.
This is exactly the sort of thing I hate about Pinoy-style campaigning. It’s all form and no substance. Unfortunately, judging by the public’s response, we will see more of these asinine gimmicks. Hay naku.
Well, it’s all one big expensive joke. I just hope no one’s laughing because ultimately it’s on all of us.
Misplaced pride is clearly Senator Noynoy Aquino’s sin. A few glaring things bear this out. First of all, just like former President Joseph Estrada, he can’t admit to himself that he doesn’t have what it takes to lead a Third World country in dire need of progress. An underachiever in Congress, Aquino hardly qualifies as the person fit to lead millions of people to a better life.
But that is not the most damning evidence of Noynoy’s misplaced pride. With the latest surveys showing a reduction in his popularity rating, the senator now finds himself facing the reality that people’s perceptions can change. However, being the proud son-of-Ninoy-and-Cory that he is, the senator simply dismisses that even though it is a likely explanation for his ratings drop. Noynoy attributes it instead to his closest rival’s supposed advantages.
(excerpt from inquirer.net report) “I am not surprised with this turn of events,” said Aquino, reading a prepared statement at a press conference Wednesday. “First, our opponents have had a long head start in this campaign. And while I diligently perform my functions as a legislator, the others are practically campaigning fulltime, neglecting their mandate with those, who entrusted them with their votes,” he said. Aquino also criticized Villar’s “unprecedented and sustained ad spending in all forms of media and the unrelenting and increasingly below-the-belt and baseless black propaganda” against him.
In fairness to Noynoy, the moneyed Villar did start his campaign earlier. There’s also no denying that the former senate president is armed with a seemingly unlimited supply of advertising funds. However, it also cannot be denied that as an excuse this is as flimsy as it can get.
Villar did start campaigning earlier because, unlike Noynoy, Villar knew what he wanted and had the guts to take action. Of course, Noynoy and his supporters could say that he never craved power and was even reluctant to run for president. That’s just good old media spin. The truth is Aquino was never reluctant. Show me a reluctant opportunist and I’d believe that.
The problem with Noynoy is he now believes his own press releases. His overestimation of his qualities has blinded him to the reality that he is not impressive at all and people are beginning to take note of that. Attributing the fluctuations in his survey ratings to the imagined maneuvering of other candidates simply shows an apparent inability to consider his own shortcomings.
True to form, Noynoy even goes as far as dragging the Arroyo administration in his blame game.
(excerpt from gmanews.tv report) The Arroyo administration and the camp of Sen. Manuel Villar Jr. are forming an “unholy alliance” for the May 10 elections, Sen. Benigno Simeon “Noynoy” Aquino III insinuated Wednesday. Aquino made the statement after Pulse Asia released its latest survey results showing a further drop in Aquino’s ratings while Villar continues to inch closer to him despite the controversy hounding him in connection with the C5 road extension project.
I sure hope the good senator or any of his handlers would be mature enough to accept that perhaps the threat to the Aquino campaign is internal not external. And, if I may suggest, presenting a genuine platform might help Noynoy regain lost ground and destroy the perception that he doesn’t have a clue how he will lead this nation. I’m not counting on it though.
I hope I’m wrong but it seems Noynoy’s only interest is his “winnability.”
(quote lifted from gmanews.tv report) “What should not escape all of us is that I still lead the surveys—from the time I declared my candidacy to this day.
I have a theory. The election campaigns of our presidential candidates are all run by one and the same group of people.
I say this because political advertisements being aired and published now are all basically saying the same things. There’s really not much difference among them. In my observation, here are some of the most glaring similarities insofar as TV ads are concerned:
1. the ads communicate the message that their candidate is a saviour of some sort
2. visual elements are mostly the same — candidates mingling with ordinary people, distraught people, poor people, etc.
3. the ads highlight at least one all-encompassing promise
4. the ads end with a cheesy slogan
5. the ads are backed by a catchy song
Advertising experts may say that with the limited allotted time — usually from 30 seconds to 1 minute — there’s hardly any room to include more substantial information therefore they just make do with using the elements enumerated above. I suspct there’s more to it than just that. I think the candidates and/or their campaign managers are just afraid to take risks and would rather just stick to tried and tested methods.
The website www.media-awareness.ca provides us with a more comprehensive list of political advertising techniques. Here it is lifted from their website:
1. Patriotism: The ad stresses the candidate’s love of and service to his/her country.
2. Gender: The ad presents the candidate as appropriately “manly” (or feminine) to make viewers trust him/her.
3. Family: The ad uses images of ideal families to give you a positive image of the candidate.
4. Excitement: The ad tries to create a sense of energy and excitement around the candidate.
5. Star Power: A celebrity is telling you that they support the candidate.
6. Bandwagon: The ad tries to create the impression that everybody already supports the candidate.
7. Put Downs: The ad insults the candidate’s opponent.
8. Facts and Figures: The ad uses facts and statistics to support the candidate’s policies.
9. Just Folks: The ad portrays the candidate as a “regular guy” (or girl).
10. Heart Strings: The ad tells a story that makes you feel good.
11. Sounds Good: The ad uses music (with or without lyrics) to be memorable, entertaining and exciting.
12. Cartoons and Animals: The ad makes its point with cartoon characters or (usually symbolic) animals.
13. Weasel Words: The ad includes promises that sound good but lack details.
14. Integrity: The ad tries to convince you that the candidate is honest and trustworthy.
15. Fear: The ad tries to frighten you into voting for the candidate (or at least not voting for his/her opponent).
(to see the list on their website go to this link)
Entry 12, cartoons and animals, is interesting. I’m sure you can make the connection yourself, but if you ask me I’d say the word reptilian comes to mind — and chicken too. I’m actually more interested in entry number 8, facts and figures. Maybe I’m wrong but I don’t think this is a standard feature in local political ads, is it? Anyway, this leads me to the main point I’ve been making all this time: Our political candidates are all just pandering and none of them are audacious enough to add more substance to their political advertisements.
This is quite unfortunate considering that more and more people are now demanding real and useful information. I’m of course talking about detailed plans. The way I see it there is an untapped opportunity here for any candidate to set himself or herself apart from the rest. This opportunity is especially perfect for candidates who are trailing behind perception-wise. Since they’re in the lowest rungs anyway they should be willing to take more risks with how they communicate their message. Instead of the usual pandering stuff they can come out with truly informative ads.
Runnning time a limitation? No problem. Just follow the format used for those one-minuter radio or TV reports. An example would be an ad featuring just the candidate talking about one specific issue and providing some specifics on exactly how he/she plans to address it.
Senator Noynoy Aquino’s “Hindi Ako Mag-Nanakaw” ad shows us that one can already say a lot of things in a one-minuter ad. Unfortunately, substance-wise it does not make the grade. Fortunately, this is easy to fix. Simply removing all the pandering stuff and keeping the focus on just one particular issue would easily do the trick.
Candidates, especially those who are lagging behind, should seriously consider this approach. In terms of cost, information-filled ads like the one I’m suggesting will obviously cost much less. The budget deprived can even create one just using a webcam and uploading the end-product on the internet. If the message is really good, the ad may even go viral.
Election time is here again. Many of you will shrug this off as another of those futile exercise that we as a dysfunctional nation go through.
Let me tell you, THIS TIME IT IS DIFFERENT. IF we make it so. Why?
1. This is the FIRST TIME THAT IT IS AUTOMATED: COMPLETE WITH FINGERPRINTS (BIOMETRICS). Naysayers talk of loopholes. But one thing is sure: Cheating will certainly be cut down (no ghost voters, no carbon papers, etc…)now. I say, first time. The next time around,some smart-pinoys will know how to go around it. Then cheating begins to accelerate again. WE HAVE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS FIRST AUTOMATED ELECTION.
2. We are now in a precarious situation: World financial crisis, Ondoy, Pepeng, Mt. Mayon, especially the pervasive apathy etc… We are slowly trudging to our doom. If we do not elect a good president this time, we will spiral down this pit. But, if we elect a good president, there is a big chance that we can rise up very quickly too. That is, if the next president will know how to position our country in the current world crisis.
3. There are more alternative media: more social networks,SMS/GMS and information is much much more accessible than before.
4. We have better choices (of candidates) now. Believe me! We do have a GOOD CHOICE!
MY APPEAL TO THE EDUCATED FILIPINOS WHO HAVE MORE ACCESS TO INFORMATION IS THIS: We must vote for the MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE TO LEAD us. AND we must CONVINCE all people within our circle of influence to vote for our choice! We, the educated people of our land should pave the way for our next president. Not the artista’s, singers, paid-media persons and other personalities. PLEASE! WE DO THIS CORNY THING EVEN JUST THIS ONCE.
HOW?
1. Be objective! Examine the candidates well. WITHOUT biases you know, surveys, benefits that you’ll gain when he’s president (for your business or careers–Pls., esp. not this! kaya naghihika-us tayo eh.), party-affiliations, strategic voting, etc… Here are some links that might start you out:
Che-Che Lazaro did a comprehensive interview of the candidates in alphabetical order. (You may also search for the interviews of candidates in the search box of probetv):
2. Do a background check on your chosen candidate: Google search, I think will do. Check allegations, counter allegations etc… (Allotted time: please do this fast! by next month: February: you should be sure of your candidate)
3. Once you are sure of your candidate, convince your household members, drivers, yaya, extended families, friends, etc… I think, our words are more credible and I hope we be relentless in convincing die-hards who are already stuck with an unsuitable candidate.
4. Go out and Vote this May (If you can). And if possible volunteer as a pollwatcher. Calling esp. the IT/computer geeks: please study the automated election well. If you see any prob., you can text/FB/e-mail etc… so we be aware what to watch out for.
5. Please pass this e-mail to all Pinoys out there.
Thank you very much.
May we rise to be a great nation once again.
God bless the Philippines!
Mabuhay!
I have just seen the latest TV ad of Senator Noynoy Aquino and I must say it’s a good one. Here it is from YouTube.
And for those who want to really savor the lines, here they are lovingly transcribed by yours truly.
Minamahal kong kababayan,
Tadhana ang nagbuklod sa atin dahil naghihingalo na ang ating bayan, Nais kong pumasok sa isang kasunduan sa inyo. Lalaban tayo para sa wastong edukasyon ng bawat batang Pilipino. Lalaban tayo para sa abot-kayang serbisyong pangkalusugan. Lalabanan natin ang kahirapan. Lalabanan natin ang mga kawatan. Lalabanan natin ang sino mang wawasak sa kalikasan. Lalabanan natin ang sino mang manggugulo sa ating kapayapaan at katahimikan.
Ang laban natin ay laban ng bayan.
Sa ngalan ng aking mga magulang at sa gabay ng diyos, gagawin ko ang lahat ng aking makakaya na pagsilbihan ang mahal nating Inang Bayan. Bilang tunay na sagot sa kahirapan at tunay na daan sa kaunlaran, ang inyong lingkod Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino the Third, isang mamamayang Pilipino, nangangako sa Diyos at sa Bayan — Hindi ako mag-nanakaw.
Powerful stuff, really.
I have to congratulate the planning and production team behind this ad. You’ve just proven to everyone that it is possible to create a campaign ad that does not involve any dancing or singing and makes use of no overly dramatic images depicting squalor, despair and hope. Additional points as well for not including shots of mindless people carrying torches. Special mention goes to the scriptwriter. You sure can write compelling copy. I sincerely admire you for skillfully filling up a tight running time of one-minute with very powerful words. And, of course, Senator Aquino. You deserve much praise for your unusually impressive delivery and presence here. All in all, you all did a great job and I think this ad deserves an award for brilliant simplicity.
With that said, let’s now put on our serious-voter’s hat.
I think this ad is unprecedented. Here we have a politician coming out with an unequivocal promise that he will not steal. Noynoy may not be the first to come out with such a pronouncement in a TV ad but I’m pretty certain he is the first one to say it in such a simple and direct-to-the-point manner.
Hindi ako mag-nanakaw.
Truly powerful. Unfortunately, there’s a problem and it is this.
Noynoy, Hindi Ka Nag-Iisa.
Yes, indeed, that’s the problem, dear Senator. You really are not alone in laying claim to this anti-corruption branding. The fact is all politicians claim they are against corruption. Even Jun Lozada and Jose de Venecia III. Oh, I forgot, you think you stand out in this aspect because of your Sincerity, Honesty, Integrity and Transparency. Sorry to burst your bubble but that’s all in your head.
Hindi Ka Talaga Nag-Iisa.Pramis.
Speaking of promises. The good senator made really good use of the very limited running time by mouthing off a number of promises all said within the context of that nebulous Aquino concept of Laban.
Again, with our thinking-voter’s hat still on, let’s see if there is any value here. Hmmm. Hmmm.
Sorry, there is none. Want proof? Check out this utakngtilapia.com exclusive interview.
Huh? Laban? Asan? Asan ang laban?
For the truly hopelessly yellow, the message here is that Noynoy’s Laban is clear only to himself. Or maybe not. Sure he may have a general grasp of what Filipinos need but that’s nothing if he can’t even inform us how exactly he will pursue and achieve his promises. Let’s refer back to his campaign ad script.
Lalaban tayo para sa wastong edukasyon ng bawat batang Pilipino = How exactly?
Lalaban tayo para sa abot-kayang serbisyong pangkalusugan = How exactly?
Lalabanan natin ang kahirapan = How exactly?
Lalabanan natin ang mga kawatan = How exactly?
Lalabanan natin ang sino mang wawasak sa kalikasan = How exactly?
Lalabanan natin ang sino mang manggugulo sa ating kapayapaan at katahimikan = How exactly?
So you see dear reader, not even this potentially award-winning ad can erase the sad fact that to this day Senator Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III has failed to properly communicate to us the substance of his candidacy. You’ve probably heard about his failure to attend the forum organized by the Carlos P. Romulo Foundation. I don’t know but it seems to me this is becoming a habit for Noynoy. Not good.
By the way, I realize that Noynoy may actually be telling us the truth when he said, “Hindi ako mag-nanakaw.” Who knows maybe he does have the will to actually keep himself clean while in office. The question is what about the people around him? Does he have the ability or guts to stand up to sycophants, influence peddlers and their mothers?
We’ll look into that later. In the meantime, here’s something for those who need to rid themselves of the hypnotic effect of Noynoy’s latest campaign ad.
(note: Writing about the (mis)adventures of Noynoy is getting tiresome. Unfortunately, someone has to do it since Noynoy’s handlers and supporters are not inclined to push their idol to do better.)
The sycophants have all come out of the woodwork. And, they’re not shy.
Before we go any further let’s agree first on what a sycophant is. Wiktionary gives us the following definitions:
In case you haven’t noticed, a number of mainstream political pundits have now established themselves as promoters and defenders of Senator Noynoy Aquino. I think some of them sincerely believe Noynoy is the one. It’s either that or they’re just Yellow Fever junkies. Anyway, this post is not about them. This is about those pro-Noynoy pundits who pretend to do what they do out of conviction when in reality they’re just doing it for their own personal gain. Di bale nang mailigaw nila ng landas ang ibang tao.
Yes, magalit na ang magagalit, but there is no more denying the fact that a number of these media commentators are advancing the pro-Noynoy propaganda because they hope to be rewarded should the senator win the election. For all we know they’re already being compensated for their publicity work by way of retainer fees.
I am no idealist. I can accept the fact that this is just the way of the world. Altruism just doesn’t pay as much as opportunism. I am also not blind to the fact that the other candidates also have their own stable of media insiders.
So, why am I zeroing in on the sycophantic pro-Noynoy pundits? Just one reason. I hate their hypocrisy.
They talk about Noynoy being the best candidate because of his “honesty” as if it is a fact. One of them even made a real effort to play down the importance of competence, saying trustworthiness is all that is needed. Are you on drugs, Mr. Pundit? We’re talking about the presidency here and you’re saying whoever will take the post need not be competent? The same commentator also had the kapalmuks to claim that of all the candidates Noynoy had the solution to one of this country’s biggest problems. Really? By the way, he said that while at the same time acknowledging that the Yellow One hasn’t been talking about his solution that much. So, how did you know Noynoy had a solution to begin with, sir?
What’s hypocritical about these mainstream pundits is the fact that, while they’re talking about Noynoy’s imagined virtues, they are actually gearing up to take advantage. Yes, magalit na ang magagalit. As I mentioned above, some of these mainstream commentators may already be receiving retainer fees. That’s nothing. That’s small change. What these opportunists are really after are the juicy appointments to this and that office. Aba, ma-appoint ka lang sa board of directors ng ilang government-controlled corporations sarap na ng buhay mo. Pang-oportunista talaga.
I have actually made a list of all these despicable political pundits in mainstream media. I’ve grouped them in terms of who their known and likely candidates are. I will refer to this list after the new president’s first 100 days in office to check who among these kapalmuks got appointed. I’m betting the pundit who said competence is not important will be one of Noynoy’s appointed officials.
Now, this may all seem like one big rant to you. Partly it is. In any case, I do have a point to make and it is this: If you really want to vote wisely this coming May, start by being more critical of each and every piece of information you encounter. Don’t be a fool and don’t just accept each and every propaganda out there. Think for yourself. Don’t let these highly-motivated agents of dumb decide for you.
With the elections just a few months away, some attention is now being given to the Comelec’s Poll Automation system. Judging from the press it’s been getting, the project is still on rather shaky ground perception-wise. The commission will have to step up its information campaign if only to ensure that the public will have sufficient understanding of the system.
One of the problems I am seeing right now with regard to automation is a lack of clarity on what it can and cannot do. This has already led to the misconception that the project in its present form will plug all exploitable loopholes. The way I see it poll automation will not guarantee that all manner of cheating would be prevented.
I seriously doubt though that cheating by way of hacking is the biggest threat. Over at www.botomoto.com there is a post about why this will not be the case. Here’s an excerpt:
Gregorio pointed out that a differentiation has to be made between the election websites and the automated election system that will be implemented.
The automated election system is protected by multiple layers of security and it will be online only during the transmission of electoral results from the 82,000 precincts. Hacking the results of just one precinct, because of its 128 bit encryption system, will take 50 years to decode. Hacking into the central servers is virtually impossible and the servers cannot be fed hacked data as it only accepts data from specific PCOS machines.
The botomoto post also pointed out that the recent hacking of government websites may be connected to an allegedly new scheme by some unscrupulous groups to squeeze money out of this year’s election contenders. You can read the post here.
In my opinion what the Comelec and the voting public should watch out for are the “offline” cheating methods such as vote-buying. From what I’ve been hearing in coffee shop and barbershop discussions, vote-buying is no longer about securing votes for a candidate but eliminating opposing votes. According to some, what election operators do is identify known supporters of opposing candidates. They then offer some form of payment to those voters in exchange for their non-appearance at the precincts on election day. If this were true, I guess we can safely assume that some form of intimidation is also involved.
If this is really how it goes down then obviously even if the automated system is 100% perfect it will have no bearing whatsoever on this alleged modus operandi. The same goes for the possible hacking of the Comelec’s website or any other election website. The website is one system and poll automation is another. Now as far as the automated system is concerned, Smartmatic has this to say (lifted from the botomoto post):
The automated polling system is virtually unhackable and there are multiple layers of assuring that the votes cast nationwide will be counted accurately,” said Gregorio.
I just hope the Comelec will get its act together and iron out all the kinks. This poll automation project is a good way of effecting some form of change in our electoral process.
bp on Bastos! princess,
baka hindi naman tanga. tinatamad lang gumamit ng tamang pagsusuri.
Princess on Bastos! baka si Kris yan?? Sirang sira na si Noynoy. Naku, iboboto nyo ba yan eh naghahari harian na ngayon palang. ...
bp on Bastos! jomex,
is noynoy making this threat?
Jomex on Bastos! Yes he is dominating the surveys baby! Noynoy all the way! Kung walang corrupt, walang mahirap! Yes Noy-Mar 2010!
Villarroyo didnt ...
Cocoy Tria on Bastos! Ya you're right! Abnoy nga talaga. Pero he's dominating all surveys. Oh God, please save the Philippines!
Filo on Bastos! Noynoy is The Debate Chicken.
Takot lang niyan maka-debate si Gordon or Gibo nang one-on-one.
Kahit kay Villar siguro olats yan kung ...
The old notion that digital content does not reach the masses is no longer that clear-cut. This is an important thing to note in our campaign to find progressive alternatives to Big Media as a setter of trends and an originator of ideas in our chronically backward society. For it is not so much the poor masses as those who wield influence via their means to […]
I’ve used the two-word term “Establishment Bloggers” quite a number of times already across many blog posts, and perhaps it is about time I get around to taking a stab at defining this term a bit more clearly. The concept has its roots in a an article I wrote way back in June of 2008 [...] […]
Things were getting a little stale around here, so I've decided to freshen up a bit. Most everything is still here, even if it's not right on the front page any more; my writings are like my children, I love them all, even if I do eventually decide some of them may be a little retarded.In the meantime, go visit AntiPinoy. Not that I've done an […]
Yeahha…Thought I’ll put this here. Away from AP. As BenK puts it You know you are starting to make a difference when you really start pissing people off, it just goes with the territory. There is no available legal recourse for her to do anything, if she wants to make a complete fool of herself in Federal [...] […]
I’ve used the two-word term “Establishment Bloggers” quite a number of times already across many blog posts, and perhaps it is about time I get around to taking a stab at defining this term a bit more clearly. The concept has its roots in a an article I wrote way back in June of 2008 [...] […]
Yesterday, Sentro's Arnel and Iya discussed corrupt practices that ordinary Pinoys engage in. Sometimes, everyone is hell bent on cursing corruption in high places while we disregard those that we ourselves regularly do. If we want real change, the challenge is that we must all change. Moreso, the smallest corruption we all engage in when put together a […]
Santino is the star of the ABS-CBN program "May Bukas Pa". He's based on San Marcelino Pan y Vino. He is a "miracle boy" who regularly speaks with Jesus Christ and creates miracles for people. It becomes such that the people want to steal him and make him slave away to make miracles at their bidding. It's a typical "miracle […]
People always say: Too much of anything is bad. I’ve always thought that all this fanaticism towards the late Ninoy is going way overboard not to mention, exaggerated. This way of thinking has probably got to do with the fact that unless a person delivered results, I will not see him as someone who has [...] […]
French Virologist Luc Montagnier is credited with having co-discovered the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and was co-recepient of the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 2008. In an uncut interview for the documentary House of Numbers, Dr. Montagnier shares some insights that may surprise those with common knowledge of HIV and AIDS. My main takeawa […]
At the end of the day, crooks go to jail or at the very least resign from their positions – in Japan and the US. The Philippines is a different story. […]
The country’s fightingest senator says that she has been doing poorly on pre-election surveys because people might look for her on the ballot under ‘Santiago’ instead of her preferred ‘Defensor-Santiago.’ Wailing at the violence inherent in the (patriarchal) system, Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago called on the Commission on Elections as well as on other w […]
The Commission on Elections will be working overtime to finish the printing of ballots. This means no Holy Week vacation for everyone involved in the printing process. Comelec Commissioner Gregorio Larrazabal says a total of 750,000 ballots are produced everyday. An increase in the daily output is expected as soon as the Comelec plugs in 5 [...] […]
I was in elementary school when I first heard of Michael Jackson. His hit songs "Thriller", "Beat It" and "Billie Jean" were enjoying heavy airplay at that time. I wasn't into music back then so I didn't really pay much attention to those songs. I did, however, enjoy watching other kids my age copying Michael's da […]
